Chicago (2002)
2002, Miramax. Directed by Rob Marshall. Renée Zellweger, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Richard Gere, John C. Reilly, Queen Latifah.
Review by
Emily Snyder and Steven D.
Greydanus
In Chicago,
the guilty live happily ever after, the innocent are neither rewarded
nor even admired, and no one sits in judgment of the whole rotten
system, while the audience is expected to leave not shaken and
challenged but humming "All That Jazz." One can call this a "cautionary
tale" if one wishes, just as one can say that the tree falling in the
woods makes a sound whether anyone hears it or not; but to do so is
only to say how one has chosen to define one’s terms. Based on actual events from the roaring ’20’s that were first
the basis of a non-musical play and a pair of non-musical films
before being turned into a musical by Bob Fosse, Fred Ebb, and
John Kander, Chicago comes to the big screen following the
success of the previous year’s Moulin Rouge! Like Moulin Rouge!, Chicago involves sordid
goings-on in a rather seamy milieu; but where the earlier film
tried to contrast its dissolute ambiance with heart-warming
sincerity and idealism, Chicago is cynical to the
core. That’s actually almost refreshing, in a way. In contrast to
Moulin Rouge, which essentially glossed prostitution and
decadence as mere foibles, Chicago is able to treat its
dodgy subject matter with sharp satire and black humor. Witness
the rousing production numbers showcasing, for example, the
defiant unrepentance of a half-dozen death-row murderesses ("Cell
Block Tango"), or the manipulability of the press ("We Both
Reached For the Gun"). On the other hand, Chicago has nothing to
counterbalance its own cynicism: Of the two innocent characters,
one is a pathetic sap, the other is a pious sheep to the
slaughter, and both are basically victims. There’s no moral
counterpoint, no character capable of putting the film’s
decadence and absurdity into perspective. In spite of all this, as directed by first-time feature film
director-choreographer Rob Marshall, who also choreographed the
TV "Annie" and "Cinderella," Chicago often manages to
overcome these difficulties, delivering darkly humorous, rousing
entertainment. The story is based on the real-life exploits of "jazz slayers"
Roxie Hart (Renée Zellweger, Nurse Betty) and Velma Kelly
(Catherine Zeta-Jones, The Mask of
Zorro), who use their media infamy to their own
advantage. The film opens with one of its strongest production numbers,
Velma Kelly’s jazz-club performance of All That Jazz,
while vaudeville wannabe Roxie looks on in awe. Velma’s routine
is supposed to be a sister act, but later we learn why Velma is
alone: She had discovered her husband and sister in bed together,
and shot them both. Not long afterwards, Roxie, learning that the
lover she’d been hoping would get her a gig lied about his
connections to get her into bed, shoots him and winds up in stir
as well. Roxie is carted away to the Cookhouse County Jail, where she
meets Matron "Mama" Morton (Queen Latifah) who runs murderer’s
row on a very lucrative favoritism. Anything, Roxie soon learns,
is possible for a price, including the services of Billy Flynn
(Richard Gere), the "razzle-dazzle" lawyer who has never lost a
case for a female client. In an ordinary musical, characters simply break into song and
dance as if it were natural, creating a stagey, artificial
ambiance. Here, Marshall and screenwriter Bill Condon and
first-time feature film director Marshall take a different route,
combining the strengths of stage and screen by playing freely
with reality and fantasy with Calvin-and-Hobbes
impunity. As any drama student knows, one of the strengths of the
theater is its propensity to eschew "reality" and head straight
for the underlying metaphor. Conversely, mainstream cinema, even
when depicting fantastic or absurd subject matter, has often
boxed itself into a kind of straightforward realism of treatment.
What Chicago does is to combine the imaginative conceits
of vaudevillian stage with the visual freedom of cinema by
intercutting between a relatively realistic depiction of events
and stagey musical interpretations of those same events. The story is staged principally through the eyes of the main
character, Roxie. Throughout the course of the film, we
constantly see two different versions of the same events: what’s
actually happening, and what Roxie’s vaudeville-soaked
imagination conjures from real-world events — fantasy sequences
that reveal the inner meaning of events in her mind. Thus, for example, in Roxie’s first press conference, the
members of the press as well as Roxie herself are alternately
seen as real people and as marionettes and dummies on the stage
performing "We Both Reached For the Gun." The conceit of Roxie
and the press as puppets could be realized on the stage, but
Marshall exploits the capabilities of the cinematic form, not
only by shuttling between reality and fantasy, but also with
surreal shots of Billy Flynn above the stage, larger than life,
controlling the puppet press — an effect impossible in the
theater, but unlikely to be found in a nonmusical film. Likewise, in the trial scene Marshall successfully wove
together the usual expectancy — the sepia colored court, the call
of witnesses and cross-examinations, with a circus occupying the
same place and time. Although none of the leads are primarily known as musical
talents, Zeta-Jones, who first started in London’s West End, has
a powerful alto and strong stage presence, and her singing and
dancing dominates every number she’s in. Though she easily
upstages Zellweger, the latter’s breathy singing voice isn’t bad,
and she’s certainly a game dancer; her skinny frame, however, is
too gaunt for the Marilyn Monroe look she takes on for her
glamorous fantasy numbers. (The "Cell Block Tango" dancers are
also on the emaciated side, a trait only heightened by their
costumes.) Gere is fine, and seems to be having fun. Among the supporting cast, Queen Latifah is unsurprisingly
excellent in her big production number, "When You’re Good to
Mama," though she’s a little flat in the in ordinary dramatic
scenes, and is thankfully somewhat toned-down from her more
lesbian stage counterpart. John C. Reilly (The Hours) is effective as usual in the
role of the clueless husband, and achieves genuine pathos in his
heartwrenching solo "Mr. Cellophane." Yet as Roxie and Velma go on to trade on their publicity as
bad-girl sweethearts with a joint vaudeville act, one has to
wonder whether if this isn’t a cynical case of life following art — a film that’s not only about playing to fickle public
tastes with razzle-dazzle, naughtiness, and not one but two
bodacious babes, but is actually itself playing to fickle
public tastes with razzle-dazzle and naughtiness and two
bodacious babes. Are we meant to be appalled by the way the
film’s merry murderesses play the system, or are we merely meant
to be entertained and titillated? In a climactic scene, Roxie and Velma sing "Nowadays," a
winking hymn to decadent modernity: "Nowadays / You can like the life you’re living Is it or isn’t it? Chicago doesn’t commit. If you see
it, bring your own moral compass. Recurring sexual and sexually suggestive dialogue, lyrics, attire, and choreography; depictions of and references to illicit affairs including a couple of brief bedroom scenes (no nudity); brief violence including a few shooting deaths; references to a number of murders; some profane and obscene language; general decadence.
You can live the life you like
You can even marry Harry / But mess around with Ike
And that’s good, isn’t it? Grand, isn’t it? Great, isn’t it?
Swell, isn’t it? Fun, isn’t it…"
